legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Indigo Group USA v. Park CA2/5
Plaintiff Indigo Group USA (plaintiff) sued defendants Truman Park (Park) and Majesty & Royalty, Inc. (Majesty) (collectively, defendants), alleging they purchased approximately 14,000 pairs of jeans and failed to pay the contract price. Defendants contended they took possession of the jeans pursuant to a consignment agreement and owed plaintiff nothing. After hearing evidence at a bench trial, the trial court agreed with defendants’ characterization of the transaction but found defendants were unjustly enriched by their continued possession of the jeans. The court ordered defendant to return the unsold jeans to plaintiff, but plaintiff asserts it was entitled to monetary restitution instead. We consider whether such a restitution remedy was required because plaintiff preferred that remedy or because there was evidence the jeans’ aggregate value had declined after defendants sold some but not all of the inventory.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale