In re Z.A. CA5
Minor Z.A. was found to have committed second degree robbery. His appointed counsel asks this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Through counsel, minor requests that we address whether the juvenile court erred when it admitted evidence of (1) the in-field identification, (2) minor’s custodial statements to a detective, and (3) the conversation between minor and his companion at the police station. He also asks that we address whether the court erred when it found the petition’s allegation true. Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to minor, we affirm.
Comments on In re Z.A. CA5