legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re M.V.
Mother appeals from jurisdictional findings and the consequent dispositional order that removed her sons,from her legal and physical custody. While not challenging the juvenile court’s finding of jurisdiction over child, pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (b), mother contends that the juvenile court erred in finding jurisdiction over another child, pursuant to subdivision (j) because substantial evidence does not support the findings under this subdivision. Mother further contends the order temporarily removing custody of both boys from her was not supported by evidence that removal was necessary to avoid a substantial danger to their physical health or emotional well-being and there were no reasonable means to protect their physical health without removing them from her custody. Court disagreed and affirmed the juvenile court’s order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale