In re J.H. CA3
In these consolidated appeals, father of the minors challenges the juvenile court’s jurisdictional findings, the disposition orders removing the minors from his custody, and a subsequent placement hearing order. Father contends (1) there was insufficient evidence to support jurisdiction; (2) there was insufficient evidence of current risk to support removal at disposition; (3) the juvenile court erred in combining the disposition hearing with the statutory review hearing; (4) the juvenile court erred in failing to make a specific visitation order for father at disposition; and (5) the juvenile court abused its discretion in denying his request for a continuance of the July 25, 2016 placement hearing.
Comments on In re J.H. CA3