David p. v. Superior Court CA5
Petitioner David P. (father) seeks an extraordinary writ from the juvenile court’s orders issued at a dispositional hearing on a supplemental petition (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 387) denying him reunification services and setting a section 366.26 hearing as to his now 11-year-old son, Daniel P. Father believes he should be provided reunification services and Daniel should be placed with Cecilia E., father’s spouse. We conclude Daniel’s petition fails to comply with California Rules of Court, rule 8.452, which governs the content requirements for an extraordinary writ petition. Consequently, we dismiss the petition.
Comments on David p. v. Superior Court CA5