legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Taeb v. Mash CA1/3
This appeal results from a deputy clerk’s repeated failure to serve plaintiff’s counsel at the mailing address in the court’s record. The trial court issued a proposed statement of decision and proposed judgment, which the clerk mailed to plaintiff’s counsel’s old address and—as a result—he did not receive them. The court, then, erroneously, filed a statement of decision and notice of entry of judgment, which were again mailed to the wrong address, and were issued without giving plaintiff the statutorily-required time to object to the proposed statement and judgment. The court acknowledged the court’s errors and granted plaintiff’s motion to vacate the statement of decision and judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (d). Appellants Abbas Mash (Mash) and Niki S. Inc. (collectively, appellants) appeal from the trial court’s order. Plaintiff contends the order is not appealable. We conclude that the order is appealable and affirm i

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale