LaPlant v. Ra CA2/4
Joseph Ra appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate a $67,344.22 default judgment in favor of Joseph C. LaPlant. Ra contends that: (1) “[t]he trial court abused its discretion by failing to consider the substance of [his] argument” that an extrinsic mistake deprived him of a fair hearing on the merits of his defense; and (2) the notice of the default proceedings was not properly served. We conclude that the court properly denied the motion to vacate.
Comments on LaPlant v. Ra CA2/4