Sacks v. Haslet CA4/1
Christine and Steven Haslet, and their business, Lucky Pup Dog Rescue (collectively the Haslets), sued Catherine Sacks and her business, Shelter Dogs to Dream Dogs (collectively Sacks). The Haslets alleged they delivered a dog ("Sandy") to Sacks for training and socialization, and about two weeks later, without the Haslets' knowledge or approval, Sacks took Sandy to a county animal shelter to be euthanized. The Haslets alleged tort, contract, and statutory causes of action.
Sacks cross-complained, asserting claims for defamation, negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent and intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, violation of Business and Professions Code section 17200 (UCL), and promissory estoppel.
Comments on Sacks v. Haslet CA4/1