legal news


Register | Forgot Password

J.B. v. Superior Court CA4/3
Petitioners E.B. (Mother) and J.B. (Father) seek a writ of mandate challenging an order of the juvenile court finding that reasonable reunification services had been provided to them and setting a selection and implementation hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 (.26 hearing). Petitioners ask that the juvenile court be ordered to return custody of their children to them or provide further reunification services. The issues in these petitions are whether substantial evidence supports the court’s findings at a 12-month review hearing that: (1) returning the children to the parents would be detrimental, (2) it was not likely the children would be returned by an 18-month review hearing, and (3) reasonable services were provided to Mother and Father. Mother and Father filed separate writ petitions. We deny the petitions.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale