P. v. King
Defendant was charged with one count of lewd acts upon a child under the age of 14. Defendant moved to suppress statements that he made during a police interview because they were involuntary. The trial court denied the motion. A jury then convicted defendant as charged. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court should not have admitted his statements made to the police because they were not voluntary, but rather, were obtained through psychological coercion and deception. Court disagreed and affirmed.
Comments on P. v. King