P. v. Rodriguez CA1/3
Erlin David Rodriguez (defendant) appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of residential burglary (Pen. Code, § 460, subd. (a)) and the trial court sentenced him to nine years in state prison. He contends the judgment must be reversed because: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction; and (2) the prosecutor committed misconduct during closing argument by improperly vouching for the prosecution’s witnesses. We reject the contentions and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Rodriguez CA1/3