In re C.H. CA5
The court adjudged appellant C.H. a ward of the court (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602) after it sustained allegations charging appellant with carrying a concealed dirk or dagger (Pen. Code, § 21310). On appeal, appellant contends: (1) the court erred when it denied his motion to suppress; (2) the evidence is insufficient to sustain the court’s true finding that he carried a concealed dirk or dagger; (3) the court erred by its failure to make an express declaration that appellant’s offense was a felony; (4) the court erred by its failure to state reasons for not declaring his offense to be a misdemeanor; (5) the court abused its discretion when it denied appellant’s request to declare his offense a misdemeanor; and (6) one of appellant’s conditions of probation is unreasonable and unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. We affirm.
Comments on In re C.H. CA5