In re A.G. CA6
R.G. appeals from a judgment terminating her parental rights to her 13-year-old son, A.G., pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. R.G. contends that the juvenile court failed to fulfill its statutory duty to consider A.G.’s wishes because the court did not explicitly inquire whether A.G. objected to the termination of R.G.’s parental rights. R.G. also asserts that A.G.’s procedural due process rights were violated because the record “suggests” A.G. was not notified of his right to object, which would have deprived him of the opportunity to be heard.
Comments on In re A.G. CA6