P. v. Avalos
Defendant was convicted of six counts of robbery and burglary and one count of street terrorism, as well as multiple enhancements. Defendant challenges the admissibility of his confession, the admissibility of a statement made by his mother to a police officer, and the sufficiency of the evidence as to the street terrorism counts and gang enhancements. Court found none of these arguments to be persuasive and affirm the judgment.
Defendant also makes two claims of clerical error as to the minute order, one of which appears to be well-taken. Court directed the clerk of the superior court to modify the minute order accordingly.
Comments on P. v. Avalos