legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Bingham CA1/5
Joshua Bingham appeals his convictions for two counts of possession of a firearm by a felon (Pen. Code, § 29800, subd. (a)(1); counts one and two), two counts of possession of a firearm by a prohibited misdemeanant (§ 29805, subd. (a)(1); counts four and five), and possession of drug paraphernalia (Health & Saf. Code, § 11364; count six). The evidence against Bingham was seized pursuant to a search warrant based on information furnished by confidential informants and police surveillance of a known narcotics dealer. Bingham contends the trial court committed prejudicial error by denying his motion to unseal, quash, and traverse the search warrant, and by failing to suppress evidence seized pursuant to the warrant. In the alternative, Bingham contends his felon in possession of a firearm convictions must be reversed on equal protection grounds. We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale