legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re E.R.
Father appeals from jurisdictional findings and the consequent dispositional order that removed his minor son, from his legal and physical custody. Father contends the juvenile court erred in finding jurisdiction under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (b) and (j), because there was no substantial evidence to support findings under these subdivisions. Father further contends the order temporarily removing physical custody of minor son from him was not supported by evidence that removal was necessary to avoid a substantial danger to minor son’s physical health or emotional well-being, and there were no reasonable means to protect minor son’s physical health without removing him from his custody. Court disagreed and affirmed the dispositional order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale