legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Sensible Growth Initiative v. City of Cupertino CA
Appellants are an unincorporated association (Committee Supporting Cupertino Citizens’ Sensible Growth Initiative) and three voters who reside in the City of Cupertino (Steven Scharf, Xiangchen Xu, and Govind Tatachari). In June 2016, Appellants petitioned for a writ of mandate to require Respondents City of Cupertino and its City Council to amend a ballot question on the ground that the wording of the question was false, misleading, and unlawful. The trial court denied the petition, and the election proceeded in November 2016 with the version of the ballot question that Appellants had challenged.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale