Lami v. Lami CA1/1
Former husband and wife Raymond Jerome Lami (Jerry) and Janice Lami (Janice) both appealed after the trial court divided marital property and issued a judgment of dissolution. Jerry argues that the trial court erred in dividing assets and obligations by relying on an order issued in a previous dissolution-of-marriage proceeding between the parties. Janice argues that the trial court incorrectly determined the parties’ date of separation, but she acknowledges that we need not reach the issue if we reject Jerry’s arguments. Because we reject Jerry’s arguments, we affirm the judgment and do not resolve Janice’s claim.
Comments on Lami v. Lami CA1/1