Yonan v. Eissa CA1/1
Rewis Yonan appeals from the denial of a civil harassment restraining order (CRO). His principal claim is that the trial court misinterpreted Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6 and erroneously concluded he had to show a “course of conduct” of harassing behavior and that a CRO cannot be granted on the basis of a single incident. He further claims that, interpreted correctly, he established his right to a CRO under section 527.6 by clear and convincing evidence. We affirm.
Comments on Yonan v. Eissa CA1/1