legal news


Register | Forgot Password

ConocoPhillips Company v. Pacific Convenience & Fu
The legal issues presented in this appeal are relatively straightforward, but they are made complicated by the multiple parties involved and the interrelated contracts at issue—of which there are several. Cross-complainants and appellants ConocoPhillips Company and Phillips 66 Company (collectively, ConocoPhillips) were two of several named defendants in a complaint Felipe and Maria Mireles filed for injuries Felipe suffered as a result of a propane fire at a 76-branded gas station. ConocoPhillips, which owns the 76 brand and licenses it to other entities, filed a cross-complaint seeking indemnity from Pacific Convenience & Fuels, LLC (Pacific), Convenience Retailers, LLC (Convenience), Sam and Shireen Hirbod (the Hirbods), Apro, LLC (Apro), Suburban Propane, LP (Suburban), Field Energy Corporation (Field Energy), and Stephen Dakay (Dakay).

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale