legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Kimberly M. CA2/4
Appellant D.E. (appellant) maintains that the juvenile court erred in denying an oral request for genetic testing to determine if he is the child’s biological father, made at the selection and implementation hearing at which parental rights were terminated. He contends the juvenile court had a mandatory duty to determine biological paternity, and remand for that purpose is required. He also claims to have been prejudiced by the court’s denial of his request to determine paternity, because he may have been granted reunification services. We conclude that, although the court had a duty to make a paternity finding, no reversal is in order because appellant could not establish an entitlement to reunification services. Any error regarding the court’s failure to make a paternity finding was harmless; the results of a genetic test would not change the outcome of this case. Accordingly, we affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale