legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Madriz CA6
A jury convicted defendant Gerardo Aboytes Madriz, Jr. of premeditated attempted murder and shooting from a motor vehicle and found true associated firearm enhancement allegations. The trial court sentenced defendant to 32 years to life in prison. On appeal, defendant seeks reversal of his conviction on grounds he was denied his right to testify in his own defense and the trial court prejudicially erred in admitting his post arrest statement over his Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 (Miranda) objection. Alternatively, defendant requests that the case be remanded to allow the trial court to exercise its discretion as to whether to strike the firearm enhancements based on a recent amendment to Penal Code section 12022.53. We agree that defendant’s post arrest statement should have been excluded and that its admission was not harmless. Accordingly, we reverse without reaching defendant’s other claims.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale