In re V.C. CA1/5
J.C. (Father) and B.K. (Mother) appeal from an order denying their petitions under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 and terminating their parental rights as to their daughter V.C. (Minor). J.C. contends he was deprived of due process because (1) the court denied one of his petitions without a hearing; (2) the proceedings were continued multiple times; and (3) one judge heard testimony and then another judge made a ruling based on the transcripts. B.K. joins in J.C.’s arguments. We will affirm.
Comments on In re V.C. CA1/5