P. v. Mayfield CA2/2
After revoking probation, the trial court sentenced appellant Dorian Markaye Mayfield to the applicable three-year mid-term sentence for his underlying offense. Mayfield claims the trial court erred as a matter of law when, at sentencing on the underlying offense, the court considered as aggravating factors Mayfield’s conduct while on probation. Although the Attorney General concedes this error, the Attorney General contends it was harmless error. Because in addition to the factors challenged on appeal the trial court relied on appropriate factors, we agree with the Attorney General and conclude the trial court’s error was harmless and not a ground for reversal.
Comments on P. v. Mayfield CA2/2