P. v. Vainqueur CA2/8
Defendant Woody Vainqueur appeals from his conviction for assault with a deadly weapon. Defendant contends the People infringed his due process rights established in Doyle v. Ohio (1976) 426 U.S. 610, 619 (Doyle) by eliciting testimony at his jury trial about his post-detention silence. We affirm the judgment because there was no Doyle error.
Comments on P. v. Vainqueur CA2/8