P. v. Sharp CA3
Defendant Channing Jacob Sharp appeals a judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of first degree residential burglary, conspiracy to commit first degree residential burglary, and resisting, delaying or obstructing a peace officer. He argues the trial court erred under Evidence Code section 352 when it allowed audio recordings of defendant being interrogated by law enforcement to be played for the jury because two statements made by the interrogating officers were prejudicial. He contends this error violated due process and his right to a fair trial. We disagree and affirm the trial court.
Comments on P. v. Sharp CA3