P. v. Pike CA1/4
After a jury trial, appellant Mark Christopher Pike (Pike) was found guilty of a number of felonies arising out of his involvement in a July 2016 domestic violence incident. On appeal, Pike contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to quash a search warrant for his cell phone on the basis that the probable cause showing in the supporting affidavit was conclusory and inadequate. Pike further asserts that the imposition of a probation report fee in accordance with section 1203.1b was improper under the facts of this case. Although we agree that the probation report fee was erroneously imposed and therefore strike it, we otherwise affirm.
Comments on P. v. Pike CA1/4