Spear v. Wells Fargo
Appellant filed suit against respondents, which include several lenders, a foreclosure investment company, two foreclosure trustees, and the present owners of the property, claiming her son’s forgery warranted cancellation of their subsequent interests in the property and that the property be returned to her sole ownership.
Appellant now appeals from judgments of dismissal in favor of respondents based upon orders sustaining their individual demurrers without leave to amend to all of the causes of action stated against them in appellant’s second amended complaint (SAC). Court concluded the superior court properly sustained the demurrers, and court affirmed the judgment dismissing her lawsuit as to these respondents.
Comments on Spear v. Wells Fargo