legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re T.A. CA4/1
S.A. (Mother) and C.A. (Father) appeal from the order terminating their parental rights to their children T.A. and G.A. Father also appeals the denial of his Welfare and Institution Code section 388 motion. Both parents contend the juvenile court should have applied the parental benefit exception to adoption as the permanent plan. (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i).) We find no error, and we affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale