legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re M.D. CA2/5
Defendant and appellant S.G. (Mother) challenges the juvenile court’s finding that her daughter M.D. is a dependent child under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (b)(1) and (j), as well as the order removing M.D. from her physical custody. The Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (the Department) has conceded, by letter filed in this court, there is insufficient evidence to support dependency jurisdiction over M.D., who never resided with Mother and had limited contact with her. We accept the concession and hold jurisdiction and removal were unwarranted under the circumstances.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale