legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Gramshoward CA4/3
Defendant appeals from a postjudgment order finding that he violated the terms of his parole, and we appointed counsel to represent him. Following her analysis of potential appellate issues, appointed counsel informed us in her declaration that she consulted with a staff attorney at Appellate Defenders, Inc. Counsel then filed a brief pursuant to the procedures set forth in People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. In that brief, counsel declined to identify potential appellate issues as suggested in Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738. Instead, she invited this court to conduct its required review of the record “unfettered by counsel’s prior thought processes.” We have now done exactly that.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale