P. v. Aguas CA4/3
Roberto Patino Aguas, Jr. (Aguas) appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of receiving a stolen vehicle with a prior felony conviction and receiving stolen property. He contends that, at the sentencing hearing, the trial court erred by imposing a narcotics offender registration requirement.
We affirm. At the sentencing hearing, after the trial court imposed sentence in the instant case, the court sentenced Aguas in two drug misdemeanor cases and, in doing so, imposed the narcotics offender registration requirement of which Aguas complains. The court did not impose that requirement in the instant case. We decline Aguas’s invitation in his appellate reply brief to review whether the narcotics offender registration requirement was properly imposed in a case that is not before us. We also decline to address the separate contentions of error the Attorney General has raised for the first time in the appellate respondent’s brief and without filing a notice
Comments on P. v. Aguas CA4/3