legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Mitchell CA2/2
Defendants Bernard Mitchell (Mitchell) and Anthony Reed Watts (Watts) (collectively, defendants) each stand convicted of six counts of second degree robbery and one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm for their roles in robbing two banks. On appeal, they challenge one of the trial court’s evidentiary rulings; Watts challenges the sufficiency of the evidence; both defendants challenge the substitution of the trial judge prior to closing argument; both defendants allege prosecutorial misconduct; and one or both defendants raise a number of sentencing issues. None of these arguments warrants disturbing defendants’ underlying convictions.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale