In re Rosemarie Q.
Appellant appeals from a June 2006 order terminating her parental rights to her two daughters. Appellant’s appointed appellate counsel submitted a letter, advising that no brief would be forthcoming. Court extended time twice for appellant to personally file a letter brief. Appellant has now filed such a letter brief with this court. In it, appellant disputes for the first time evidence in the record. Appellant also complains her trial attorney should have asked the court to grant long-term foster care, instead of termination of parental rights, based on the progress she has allegedly made. The appeal is dismissed.
Comments on In re Rosemarie Q.