Marriage of E.M and J.M. CA1/5
E.M. (mother) appeals in pro. per. from a permanent order awarding full custody of her two minor children to J.M. (father). (See Enrique M. v. Angelina V. (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 1371, 1377–1378 [permanent custody order appealable].) She contends: (1) the court should have admitted a transcript of several witnesses’ prior testimony under Evidence Code section 1291; (2) the court should have disqualified itself under Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6 and its remarks show it was biased against her; (3) the proceedings were prejudiced by the misstatements of opposing counsel; (4) the court erred in allowing a detective to testify without qualifying as an expert; (5) there was no evidence that circumstances had changed or which supported a change in custody; and (6) the court should have issued a statement of decision under Code of Civil Procedure section 632. We affirm.
Comments on Marriage of E.M and J.M. CA1/5