Grant v. AssistMed, Inc. CA2/1
Plaintiff David Grant sued his former employer AssistMed, alleging AssistMed breached the loan, stock option, expense reimbursement, and severance pay provisions of an employment agreement between the parties. Grant now appeals from the superior court’s judgment, after a court trial, in favor of AssistMed. On appeal, Grant: (A) challenges the court’s interpretation of the terms in that agreement regarding a loan AssistMed was to provide Grant for a down payment on a home and moving expenses; and (B) argues the court erred in granting AssistMed’s motion for judgment under Code of Civil Procedure section 631.8 because Grant “presented substantial evidence that AssistMed breached [the employment agreement].”
Comments on Grant v. AssistMed, Inc. CA2/1