P. v. Vogt CA1/4
A jury convicted Kyle Clifton Vogt of committing multiple sex offenses against his girlfriend’s half sisters (J.A. and Jo.A.) and the daughter of a family friend (A.P.) when they were minors aged 15 or younger. Defendant raises a host of contentions on appeal. He argues the trial court erroneously admitted evidence linking him to a computer containing child pornography; his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to present certain evidence and witnesses at trial, including experts on computer forensics and Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome (CSAAS); and the prosecution violated his right to due process by withholding evidence favorable to the defense and presenting false testimony at trial. We find no merit in these contentions and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Vogt CA1/4