Xeo International v. Fantasia Distribution CA4/3
In this case stemming from a soured business relationship, defendant Fantasia Distribution, Inc. (Fantasia), appeals from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff XEO International, Ltd. (XEO). Fantasia argues the trial court, as the trier of fact, committed multiple errors in evaluating XEO’s breach of contract cause of action. It claims the court failed to apply the proper law, drew conclusions which lack evidentiary support, wrongfully awarded certain damages, and unwarrantedly rejected its contention that the contract at issue was void because XEO’s was not qualified to do business in California at the time it filed suit and at the time it entered into the contract with Fantasia. Fantasia also contends the court’s written statement of decision concerning its cross-complaint was inadequate because it lacked any analysis to support its conclusions. We disagree in all respects and, therefore, affirm the judgment.
Comments on Xeo International v. Fantasia Distribution CA4/3