Mohsen v. Cadence Design Systems CA6
In this appeal plaintiff Amr Mohsen seeks review of an order sustaining a demurrer to his second amended complaint without leave to amend in his action alleging “fraud on [the c]ourt” against Cadence Design Systems (Cadence), Quickturn Design Systems (Quickturn), and numerous individuals associated with prior patent litigation in federal district court. Representing himself, as he has throughout the proceedings, Mohsen contends that reversal is required because he stated a timely and substantively sufficient claim. We disagree and therefore must affirm.
Comments on Mohsen v. Cadence Design Systems CA6