legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Carlos S. CA2/7
Carlos S. appeals from the juvenile court’s order of wardship based on a sustained Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 petition that alleged one count of felony vandalism (Pen. Code, § 594) with a gang enhancement (Pen. Code, § 186.22, subd. (d)). On appeal, Carlos challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the juvenile court’s true finding on the gang enhancement allegation, and its finding that the underlying offense caused $400 or more in damage, as required for a felony offense. Carlos also raises various claims about the People’s alleged reliance on certain cost-averaging restitution provisions to prove that the vandalism was a felony. We conclude there was substantial evidence to support the gang enhancement finding, but not the felony vandalism finding. We accordingly reverse the juvenile court’s order in part and remand the matter for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale