P. v. Malzahn
After the court denied a motion to suppress evidence, defendant entered a negotiated guilty plea to possessing stolen property. The court sentenced him to a stipulated 16-month lower term in prison.
On appeal, defendant’s counsel refers to as possible but not arguable issues: (1) whether defendant's guilty plea was constitutionally valid; (2) whether an adequate factual basis supports the guilty plea; and (3) whether the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress evidence. The judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Malzahn