legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re I.W. CA1/3
J.W., the paternal grandfather (grandfather) of two-year-old I.W., appeals an order denying his petition for modification pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 requesting that his grandson be placed with him. He contends the court erred in failing to apply the section 361.3 relative placement preference in considering his petition.
In a consolidated appeal, mother appeals from the juvenile court’s order terminating her parental rights and selecting adoption as the child’s permanent plan. She also contends the court erred in denying grandfather’s request for placement and argues that the error was prejudicial because placement with the grandfather would have precluded the need for termination of her parental rights.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale