Pifer v. Pifer CA4/1
These two appeals by two limited partners, plaintiffs and appellants Kevin Pifer and Steven Pifer ("Appellants"), arise out of rulings on their amended cross-complaint, which challenged the administration of a restated family limited partnership, Pifer Property Holdings LP (the "partnership"). Demurrers brought by defendant and respondent Stacy Kate Pifer ("Kate") and her affiliated entity, defendant and respondent Pifer LLC, were sustained without leave to amend. A judgment on the pleadings brought by defendant and respondent Phoebe Moffatt (Moffatt) was granted without leave to amend. On appeal, Appellants argue the court erred as a matter of law in finding their 13 derivative and/or direct causes of action are defective, and in an exercise of discretion, it should have granted them leave to amend.
Comments on Pifer v. Pifer CA4/1