P. v. Grosse CA3
A jury convicted defendant Clinton Grosse of continuous sexual abuse of his stepdaughter E.D. The trial court sentenced him to six years in prison.
Defendant now contends the trial court erred in (1) allowing the People to amend the information after defendant waived his right to a preliminary hearing; (2) excluding the testimony of defendant’s daughters; (3) admitting evidence of E.D.’s out-of-court statements as fresh complaints; (4) instructing the jury with CALCRIM No. 318, which allowed the jury to consider fresh complaint evidence for the truth of the matter asserted; and (5) excluding approximately six minutes from the video recording of E.D.’s police interview. Defendant further contends the prosecutor (6) committed misconduct by making certain remarks during her rebuttal closing argument.
Finding no prejudicial error, we will affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Grosse CA3