In re A.O. CA3
A.O. (minor) appeals from the order of the juvenile court dismissing dependency jurisdiction. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 300 & 395.) The minor contends there is insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s determination that his mother, A.J. (mother), rebutted the presumption that he is a person subject to dependency jurisdiction pursuant to section 355.1. The minor further contends there is insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s conclusion that he was not at risk of serious physical harm as a result of the failure or inability of mother to supervise and protect him. We affirm the juvenile court’s orders.
Comments on In re A.O. CA3