legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Brian P.
While on juvenile probation for first degree burglary and misdemeanor possession of a deadly weapon in exchange for dismissal of two allegations involving methamphetamine (transportation and possession) in another juvenile petition. The juvenile court continued the minor on probation and, as one term of probation, ordered him committed to the South Lake Tahoe Challenge Program for 223 days. The minor appeals. Appellant contends (1) the juvenile court erroneously calculated his maximum period of confinement without considering whether to impose less than the maximum as provided by section 731, subdivision (b) and (2) one of the written terms of probation fails to reflect the oral pronouncement of the juvenile court. Court agreed that the written term of probation requires correction to reflect the court’s oral pronouncement but concluded that the juvenile court properly specified the minor’s maximum period of confinement.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale