In re G.J. CA4/2
Due to work obligations, M.J. (Mother) allowed her boyfriend to watch her two-year-old son G.J. and five-year-old son Ga.J. While in her boyfriend’s care, G.J. suffered numerous serious injuries and Mother failed to protect him. As a result, the children were removed from Mother’s care, and Mother was offered reunification services. On appeal, Mother contends there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s jurisdictional and dispositional findings removing the children from her care. The minors have also appealed. On appeal, the minors argue that there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s order granting Mother reunification services absent “competent testimony” and best interest of the children. Counsel for the San Bernardino County Children and Family Services (CFS) responds that there was sufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s jurisdictional and dispositional orders, and agrees with the minors that the court erred
Comments on In re G.J. CA4/2