legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Ammari v. Christensen CA2/2
These three consolidated appeals arise out of acrimony between neighbors. The first appeal involves the denial of an application filed by Sami Ammari (Ammari) for civil harassment restraining orders (Code Civ. Proc., § 527.6) against Max Christensen (Max). The other two appeals involve the grant of applications filed by Mary Frances Christensen (Mary) and Hermine Temurian (Temurian) for civil harassment restraining orders against Ammari. Ammari challenges all three of the orders. Because he offers no argument regarding the denial of his application for civil harassment restraining orders, we deem his appeal from that order abandoned and therefore order it dismissed. (Rossiter v. Benoit (1979) 88 Cal.App.3d 706, 710–711; Berger v. Godden (1985) 163 Cal.App.3d 1113, 1120.) With respect to the orders granting the applications of Mary and Temurian, we find no error and affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale