legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Padilla v. Jakubaitis CA4/3
Plaintiff Carlos Padilla III (Padilla) appeals from the order granting defendant Frank Jakubaitis’s special motion to strike under California’s anti-SLAPP statute, Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, which struck the defamation claim alleged against Jakubaitis from Padilla’s first amended complaint. (All further statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure unless otherwise specified.) Padilla contends the trial court erred by granting the anti-SLAPP motion because (1) the motion was untimely; (2) Jakubaitis lacked standing to file the motion because he had filed a bankruptcy petition; and (3) Padilla carried his burden of proving a probability of prevailing on his defamation claim. We reject each of Padilla’s arguments and affirm the order granting the anti-SLAPP motion striking the defamation cause of action.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale