P. v. Gilliam CA1/2
Appellant Shavar Gilliam appeals from the trial court’s order revoking his parole. On appeal, he contends the court misunderstood and misapplied the concept of unconsciousness resulting from involuntary intoxication, which violated his constitutional right to due process. Although we reject this contention, we nevertheless conclude the court’s finding that appellant was conscious was not supported by substantial evidence. Because the court therefore abused its discretion when it ordered appellant’s probation revoked, we will reverse that order.
Comments on P. v. Gilliam CA1/2